Category Archives: Book Reviews

The Picture Book that Predicted the Present Moment

The Prophetic Warning of “Goodnight iPad”

It caught my eye immediately as it slipped into the classroom library basket. “What is THAT?

My fifth grade student brought it over to me. She was a voracious reader, and picture books were not her usual fare.

But, like me, she must have recognized its connection to everyone’s favorite bedtime classic. I’d read Goodnight Moon so many times to my son that I’d memorized it.

It was 2011. Just one year after the iPad’s launch. A few fifth graders had them at home.

The impact of the digital world on my students was already evident

A few more had their own iPhones. One fifth grader, as I recall, already had hundreds of followers on Instagram. Once, she showed me a picture of a bug she’d posted. A bug. It had hundreds of likes.

The impact of the digital world on my students was already evident. Except for their technology class, their access was entirely outside of school at this time.

But it showed up in their conversations, in their interest in books and their homework, and at dismissal to carpool at the end of the day. The first thing the kids who had phones did when they left class was pull them out and scroll or text.

The big question often discussed among parents and teachers back then was Do children really need their own phones? As we would learn, the collective answer was going to be ‘yes.’

Goodnight iPad! I couldn’t wait for my next planning period when I could sit down and read it.

That reading was a pivotal moment for me. Looking back, I think it’s the moment when I knew I would eventually write The Invisible Toolbox.

I’d long been interested in how the simple practice of parents reading to their children regularly in the early years impacted their child’s future learning. Through my many years in the classroom and as a parent, I could see that it mattered a lot.

Goodnight iPad portended a future in which this was much less likely to happen.

Much in this charming story, penned cleverly by author Ann Droyd, is dated. It’s been 15 years after all. Remember Angry Birds? A 2009-launched massively popular video game. Blackberries? Originally a hand-held pager, it evolved into a smartphone.

Regardless, there were harbingers of truth that predicted exactly where we are now. They’re so obvious that it may be unnecessary to point them out. But I will anyway, because they’ve had a profound effect on children’s brain development and ability to learn.

Isolation and Fragmented Attention

Instead of one little bunny and the old lady whispering, “hush,” we have three generations of bunnies. Quite a few bunny children, a set of parents, and a grandmother—all absorbed in their own devices. Except for Granny.

Video games, movies on the big screen, iPhones, Facebook, YouTube videos. Dad appears to be reading a digital book on a Nook, Barnes and Noble’s now discontinued e-reader. Granny, trying to catch a few winks, grows frustrated watching all this from her rocker, unable to sleep because of the noise of the ‘bings, bongs, and beeps’ all around her.

For those of us of a certain age who can remember growing up with limited TV channels and no personal devices, the loss of family-oriented leisure time is obvious. No one is sharing anything. Each family member is absorbed in the world of their own device.

No one is sharing anything. Each family member is absorbed in the world of their own device

The one exception is the group gathered around the enormous TV watching a scene from the 1968 Stanley Kubrick sci-fi film classic 2001: A Space Odyssey. A group of monkeys are gathered around a black monolith which, in the movie, represents a “religious or mystical object of transcendence that triggers the final step in human evolution.”

The final step in human evolution.

Looks like the author was trying to tell us something.

The symbolism is apt. Like the monkeys, our attention has been fully captured by an inanimate, yet transcendent, object. We now have a window with a view into, arguably, everything in the world.

Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation (2024), might agree. He’s revised his former belief that anxiety is the most concerning fallout of the digital age. Haidt now believes that loss of attention is even more consequential. Our ability to think deeply and persevere is eroding.

But maybe even more damaging is that in taking us out of our lived world virtually, our ability to connect in the present is diminished.

Distracted Parents

In our story scenario Mom and Dad are every bit as absorbed in in their own devices as the kids are.

When sleepless Granny finally has had enough of the digital cacophony, she puts her foot down and yells, “Okay, that’s it!”

No gentle hushing here. She’s on her feet now, gathering up everyone’s devices.

Oh, the begging, the tears, and tugs of war. Mom, still dressed in her corporate suit—it was 2011 after all—is just as distressed as the kids are at having her Blackberry taken away.

Out it all goes—right out the window!

It’s a very funny scene, but sadly true at the same time. Parents are now just as addicted to their screens as their kids are.

We’ve all seen the family out for a meal together at a restaurant with everyone on their phones instead of engaging with one another. Or the toddler in the grocery store cart, Mom’s phone in hand, making it easier for her to get the errand over with.

Parents are now just as addicted to their screens as their kids are

Screens have become so vital to our everyday experience and so tempting for use as a babysitter that many parents haven’t paused to consider the effects on their children.

Common Sense Media recently reported that 40% of toddlers now have their own tablets by the time they’re two. More than 50% have their own device by age 4.

That statistic makes me shudder.

Studies of children’s brain scans show that children who have significant screen time have less white matter than those who not only don’t, but have also been read to. This means fewer neural connections are made, the very infrastructure necessary for language and literacy.

Even scans of children with less than two hours of daily screen time show reduced white matter.

The distraction of parents that includes lack of awareness about screen damage means that children may not be getting the attention they need from their parents—or the shared activity that would be the greatest gift they could receive from them.

Decline in Reading for Pleasure

This picture is the saddest and most telling one of all.

Gen X Bunny Dad may still read a novel, but he’s on his e-book, so the children don’t see actual book reading modeled by an adult.

The cobwebbed bookshelves are bare. Whatever books that remained are trashed along with the newspaper and the gooseneck reading lamp.

This doesn’t bode well for the bunny kids’ futures, and it’s unfortunately what many households look like today.

Children with no books in the home will be behind when they start kindergarten. When children struggle to learn to read, they’re much less likely to pick up a habit of reading for pleasure.

Children with no books in the home will be behind when they start kindergarten

The Children’s Reading Foundation reports that 4 out of 10 children entering kindergarten in the U.S. are three years behind their peers, and 75% of them will never catch up.

Jim Trelease, author of The Read Aloud Handbook, explained that vocabulary is the #1 predictor of school success. Numerous studies show that reading aloud to children even once daily in the earliest years exposes them to 296,660 more words than their peers who were never read to. Reading five books a day will result in a 1.4 million word advantage.

Children who are read to in the early years arrive at kindergarten with a lunchbox in one hand and an invisible toolbox in the other that holds the pre-literacy tools they need to learn to read. They’re also more likely to develop a reading for pleasure habit.

For a growing number of parents, however, the practice of daily shared reading is waning. A Harper Collins UK survey last year reported that more than half of the Gen Z parents asked did not “enjoy” reading to their children.

The decline in reading for pleasure means less cognitive development and lower test scores across all subjects.

In school age students, our nation’s report card the NAEP, indicates that reading scores continue to fall. In 2024, 69% of our 4th graders did not test as proficient readers. 70% of 8th graders were not proficient.

The ACT scores of college-bound high school seniors have dropped in all subjects. Children who don’t read well will struggle to learn in all areas.

College professors complain they’ve had to reduce the amount of expected reading for their classes drastically.

The loss of the habit of reading for pleasure has far-reaching results that profoundly affects learning potential.

Are we doomed to a future loss of attention and decline?

Is there a way back from our technological capture that, post-pandemic, means more time on devices even during the school day? Are we doomed to a future loss of attention and decline?

The author hints at the antidote in the final page.

In my next post I’ll address what parents can do to help insulate their child from the spell of these “mystical objects of transcendence.” Stay tuned.

“Screen Schooled: Two Veteran Teachers Expose How Technology Overuse is Making Our Kids Dumber”

Thoughts on One of the Most Important Education/Parenting Books You Really Need to Read

They haven’t used it. We limit how much technology our kids use at home.”

—Steve Jobs on How His Kids Liked the iPad

Distracted. Disengaged. Unable to follow simple directions. Poor executive functioning (the ability to plan, organize, and carry out tasks). Inattentive.

These are just a few of the adjectives that I’ve heard from teachers and substitute teachers who worked in various schools last year when asked to describe how they were finding students who returned to the classroom post-pandemic.

One high school English teacher instructed her long-term substitute to not assign chapters of the novel students were reading for homework. One might think, but don’t they need to do that so that they can engage in follow up activities about the readings together in class?

“They won’t bother to do it,” she said. “You’ll be listening to the book together in class via Audible. Then they’ll complete the follow up material about each chapter on their Chromebooks.”

Do students still pull out a book they’re reading for pleasure when they finish their work? Rarely. Most don’t bring one to class. Some high school and junior school high teachers even allow students free time on their phones when they finish their work.

The culture in schools is changing. The deleterious effects of school closures through COVID have certainly accelerated this, but the transition was already in place before.

After reading Screen Schooled by Joe Clement and Matt Miles (Chicago Review Press) in 2018 I brought my copy to the school where I was teaching and actually carried it around on campus for a few days, eager for an opportunity to share it with my admin staff. It articulated so clearly and thoroughly what I believed!

I never did that. Chickened out.

I must have sensed that the push toward putting every child on a laptop in the classroom was already in full force and that my concerns might not necessarily be welcome. The book’s message challenges the direction we were heading as a school.

What Do Kids Really Need?

As it turns out, the message of Screen Schooled runs increasingly counter to the mainstream in educational America in both the public and private spheres today. If in pre-COVID days the water was rising, we’re now in full flood mode as any considerations about the negative effects of the proliferation of technology in the classroom appear to be swept away. In our post-COVID world back in school, kids are on personal laptops and iPads even more than they were before the pandemic.

And as Screen Schooled explains so effectively, there is a cost.

The authors, two high school teachers, are no Luddites and actually quite techie themselves. Clement was employed in the tech industry before becoming a teacher, and Miles was an IT major in college before switching to education. He serves as his department’s “technology representative.”

The authors, then, are not anti-technology, nor am I. It can be extremely useful in furthering learning goals in the classroom if used purposefully, and its use was essential in keeping teachers connected to students and able to deliver lessons during COVID lockdown.

Yet, Clement and Miles have witnessed the damage that screen “overuse and misuse” has wreaked on our kids— even before schools shut down—and they are alarmed about it. Their concerns have to do with this fundamental question:

What do kids really need?

“Make a list of ten things that kids today need. Go ahead. I’ll wait.

Thanks for doing that. Now look at that list. Does it include “more screen time”? I didn’t think so. Mine doesn’t either. If I had asked you to make a list of twenty things kids today need, would “more screen time” have been on that one? How about if it were a list of a hundred or a thousand things kids need? The point is that while there is nearly universal agreement that kids today do not need more time on screens, schools are doing what they can to make sure kids spend more time on screens.”

From the Introduction

Their conclusion, based not only on their experience as teachers, but also on their deep dive into research and data, is that our children’s current screen saturation is damaging their healthy development both socially and cognitively.

If “More Screen Time” Isn’t What Kids Really Need, Why the Push into Classrooms?

If this is the case, and I believe most thinking adults would agree it is so, then questions must be asked. One of the things I most appreciated about the book is that it addresses, head-on, this elephant in the room:

If more time on screens is not what kids really need, then what is driving the push to integrate technology into nearly every discipline of K-12 education?

One reason is the misguided claim that children who experience low-tech education will lag behind their technology saturated peers and be unprepared for the future world of work.

The authors address this fallacy by pointing to the educational choices parents who work in high-tech industries are making for their own children. Like Steve Jobs (see quote above), these are the people who deeply understand the extraordinary products they create. They know the wonders of technology and they also know what the repercussions can be for misuse in the hands of a child whose brain is still developing.

The Waldorf School’s philosophy emphasizing hands-on education, in-person social interaction, and creative problem solving is increasingly popular with the tech community in Silicon Valley. Technology use is rejected both in and outside of school, and some schools even require parents to sign contracts promising to limit their child’s use at home.

“Back-to-school nights at Waldorf schools are a who’s who of the technology world, with executives from eBay, Google, Yahoo, Apple, and Hewlett-Packard…Seventy-five percent of Waldorf students in Silicon Valley have ties to the tech industry.” p. 175

But don’t these tech titans worry that their screen limited children will fall behind their peers, unprepared for their tech-dominated futures? Apparently not. They understand that the purpose of early education is to develop foundational, developmentally appropriate skillsets that will always be useful, regardless of future trends.

“As Alan Eagle, an executive at Google who is a Waldorf parent and has a computer science degree from Dartmouth explains, “At Google and all these places, we make technology as brain-dead easy to use as possible. There’s no reason why kids can’t figure it out when they get older.” p. 175

The second reason for the push for technology-centered education is explained in a chapter titled “The Education-Industrial Complex.” The reality is that, inasmuch as teachers don’t typically see it this way, education is a business, and a great deal of money is at stake.

Millions of dollars have changed hands as schools have spent to upgrade their hard and software, and technology and publishing companies both large and small have scrambled to create and market their products.

Industries, government entities, and decision makers in education work hand-in-glove to make decisions and shape curriculum. The story of how Common Core Standards came into being through the involvement of Bill Gates and Microsoft, former U.S. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, and several D.C. based organizations is just one example of the inbred decision-making that drives educational practice and affords lucrative benefits for the prime movers.

What Kids Really Do Need

Neither of these two reasons for technology’s push into the classroom actually address the question of what kids really need.

The authors do, however. Their final chapter, “Ideal Education in a Modern World” outlines the key principles that should shape educational decisions: Keep it Simple, Focus Instruction on Skills (real, not virtual), and Foster Face to Face Social Interaction. If the use of technology supports or enhances these principles, great. If not, teachers should not feel pressured to impose it into their instruction.

The goal is that students will develop real-world skills, learn to think deeply and critically, and learn how to collaborate. In other words, the things kids really need that will carry them into an unknown future.

Book Talk: The Invisible Toolbox

by Adrian of the Westmont Public Library

Did you know that The Invisible Toolbox is available on audio too? It’s not only a quick read, it’s a fast listen, too, at just two hours. Here’s what Adrian, the youth services librarian at the Westmont Public Library, has to say about it:

“You may have heard that it’s important to read aloud to your child from birth, but you may not have heard why…”

The Invisible Toolbox: The Power of Reading to Your Child from Birth to Adolescence is available on audio as well as paperback through these links: